摩菱智能移动充电桩将新能源汽车快速充电技术与自动驾驶系统结合,可提供灵活、可移动的电动汽车充电服务,缓解社区充电网络不完善、充电桩资源紧张。(光明网记者 潘迪摄/光明图片)
爱普生工业AR眼镜采用硅基OLED纳米级别显示屏,形成120寸AR(增强现实)成像,搭配头戴式设计,使工人在长时间佩戴下保持舒适。工业AR眼镜能够在工厂生产中的产品检修环节,通过实时AR连线,请维修专家远程指导抢修,帮助工业企业降本增效。(光明网记者 潘迪摄/光明图片)
“之江天目”异构智能计算机是为之江实验室研发的全球首台基于开放计算规范的千卡规模液冷智能计算机,该计算机可支撑超千亿参数巨量模型的高效、并行训练。(光明网记者 潘迪摄/光明图片)
中国电科AOE空气消毒机采用活性复合粒子发生技术,主动释放出无毒无害的“活性复合粒子”,主动捕获病毒、细菌和真菌并破坏其化学结构,有效切断病菌传播途径。(光明网记者 赵金悦摄/光明图片)
“飞艇无人机”由桐乡市乌镇鹰航科技有限公司自主研发,通过创新地将飞艇技术和无人机技术相结合,让其既能在空中保持足够的机动能力,又能长时间空中作业。该产品可广泛应用于直播拍摄、巡查测绘、应急通讯等场景。(光明网记者 赵金悦摄/光明图片)
国家电网展示的“水下电缆巡检机器人”主要用于湖泊、河流等水域水下电缆故障巡视和定位查找工作,最大潜入深度可达150米。借助其水下泛光面积大、回传视频清晰、巡检速度快等技术优点,其应用能够大幅提升水下电缆例行巡视维护和故障快速查找及处理效率。(光明网记者 赵金悦摄/光明图片)
这款来自腾讯公司的眼动输入仪吸引了不少人关注。该仪器可精准捕捉残障人士眼球滚动实现打字功能,帮助提升打字效率一倍以上。(光明记者 赵金悦摄/光明图片)
Vivo展出的全场景开放式手车互联组件,可以实现手机与车机间“一键秒传”文件、图片或视频,同时,导航、音乐、通知、日程等功能也可在两者间无缝跨端流转,让手机与汽车在安全、智能的驾驶体验中便捷配合。(光明记者 赵金悦摄/光明图片)
与普通的拍照打卡不同,观众可在展会上的XR元宇宙体验区佩戴MR眼镜,在未来与过去、乌镇水乡与宇宙空间之间自由“穿越”。这项技术基于元宇宙概念,打造5G云XR空间计算平台,通过云AR技术来连接“虚”与“实”。(光明记者 赵金悦摄/光明图片)
这辆智能电动自行车车架均由碳钎维制造,周身仅重15kg,能单手拎起,目前为同类产品中最轻。该产品拥有LED点阵屏、指纹解锁、智能识别声控指令等功能。借助一枚智能传感器实现骑行“千人千面”,为骑行者带来身轻如燕的骑行体验。(光明记者 赵金悦摄/光明图片)
策划:李政葳
摄影:潘迪 赵金悦
文字:孔繁鑫 邱晓琴
中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图:日本福岛第一核电站。2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。
因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。
日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
(文图:赵筱尘 巫邓炎) [责编:天天中] 阅读剩余全文() |